Journey Home Genealogy

Irish Genealogical Research | Dwight Radford

Call Today! 801.699.2450

Or send us an Email

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Ireland
  • United States
    • American Genealogy (general)
    • Native American
    • African American
  • Canada
  • International Genealogy
    • England and Wales
    • Scotland
    • Other Research
  • Research Services
  • Research Proposal

Researching the Irish and Anglo-Americans in Spanish America (Part 2)

5 Oct By Dwight Leave a Comment

The Spanish and later Mexican governments kept records of settlers. A good treatment can be found in George R. Ryskamp’s chapter “Colonial Spanish Borderland Research” in The Source: A Guidebook to American Genealogy, 3rd ed, edited by Loretto Szucs and Sandra Luebking  (2006): 699-733.

Concerning records in general, much has been published or made available online. For example, Lawrence H. Feldman’s Anglo-Americans in Spanish Archives: Lists of Anglo-American Settlers in the Spanish Colonies of America (1991) documents settlers in what is now Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri.

Spanish and Mexican land grants are among some of the most important sources. As Spanish America became part of the USA piece by piece, land owners had to prove their ownership, which created a whole new set of records from the American perspective. A good discussion of land can be found in E. Wade Hone’s chapters on “Spanish Possession” and “Mexican Possession” in his encyclopedic Land & Property Research in the United States(1997). To access online material on grants, Google the key word “Spanish Land Grants,” “Mexican Land Grants” and of course “Private Land Claims.”

Texas provided its own complexity as Spain opened Texas for Anglo-American settlement in 1820, one year before Mexico declared its independence. The ensuring Mexican land grants continued until 1835. These settlers created the Republic of Texas in 1836; which was annexed into the USA in 1846. In California, the land system was known as the Ranchos under both Spain (1784-1821) and Mexico (1833-1846). The Rancho boundaries became the basis for California’s land survey system. 

This fascinating piece of American history will take you through land, tax, military and court records. Fortunately, much is readily available. Always check online first, then published books, and then manuscript material. You might be surprised what you find.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: American Frontier, Colonial America, Ethnic Connections, Immigration and Emigration, Research

Researching the Irish and Anglo-Americans in Spanish America (Part 1)

4 Oct By Dwight Leave a Comment

Many Irish and Anglo-Americans settled in the Spanish and Mexican territories of what is now the USA. They arrived as merchants, soldiers in the Spanish military, farmers, or as adventurers. They often obtained land grants. To buffer the expanding United States after the Revolutionary War, Spain began opening up vacant lands for settlement. Regardless of why they arrived, remember they were not living in the United States. They were in Spanish America, with different laws, language, culture, and even religion. This subject applies equally to Irish Catholics and Protestants, as both would swarm southward.

Areas of settlement can be found mainly in the modern day areas of southern Alabama, California, Florida, eastern Louisiana, southern Mississippi and Texas. Louisiana was divided between France and Spain; while Florida was contested between Spain and Great Britain. So always tie your history into your research.

Culturally, it’s important to remember that these settlers became Spanish subjects. Foreigners were required to take an oath of allegiance, and convert to Catholicism.

In regards to religion, while technically conversion was a prerequisite to settlement, it could not always be enforced as there were no few priests on the frontier.

The advent of so many settlers meant Spain would lose its lands piece by piece. Areas in Mississippi and Alabama were abandoned by 1799, Eastern Louisiana declared independence and was annexed by the USA in 1810, and in 1813 the port of Mobile was also annexed by the USA. Finally by 1821, Spanish Florida was transferred to the expanding USA. After the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the process would be complete for most of the areas considered Spanish.

Tomorrow’s blog will be on some of the records left behind to document this intriguing piece of USA history.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: American Frontier, Colonial America, Ethnic Connections, Spanish America

The Irish Connection to Jamaica

17 Sep By Dwight Leave a Comment

Jamaica has a long history with the Irish immigration from the 1660s through the 1840s. In 1655, the English invaded and took the island from Spain. The wealth this colony brought back to England was simply unimaginable.

The first Irish were indentured servants in the 1600s. This would shift to the massive African slavery. The two groups intermarried creating a distinct “Black Irish.” Many Loyalists from the mainland went to the island during and after the American Revolution. By 1785, the population stood at 30,000 whites, 10,000 “free colored,” and 250,000 slaves. The slaves were emancipated  in 1834, and new workers were imported including Irish from counties Antrim and Kildare.

Jamaica is divided into parishes, and records are classified by this system. Some parishes have been absorbed into others. Reference works to guide you through the many records are Madeleine E. Mitchell’s Jamaican Ancestry: How to Find Out More (2008); Stephen D. Porter’s Jamaican Records: A Research Manual (1999).

The Jamaica Archives and Records Department in Kingston: www.jard.gov.jm houses the primary records of the country. Large collections are on microfilm at the Family History Library: www.familysearch.org The state religion from 1655 was the Anglican Church. Quakers, Jews, Roman Catholics, Methodists and Moravians all had a historical presence. The best way to trace Quakers is in the Philadelphia Friends records transferring from Jamaica, as most had left by 1749.

Records can also be found at the National Archives (KEW): www.nationalarchives.gov.uk Genealogy sites include “Genealogy in Jamaica”: www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~jamwgw An equally amazing website is “Jamaican Family Search”: www.jamaicanfamilysearch.com The “Caribbean Genealogy Research” website has a Jamaica page which has handy inventories: www.candoo.com/genreseources/jamaica.htm

Because, Jamaica was such an important colony in the British Empire, a wealth of records were left behind from which to trace your Irish roots. This crosses all color lines.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: Caribbean Islands, Colonial America, Ethnic Connections

Scots-Irish and Muscogee (Creek) Connection

11 Sep By Dwight Leave a Comment

The Scots-Irish came into Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Alabama, Georgia and Florida, and intermarried. The tribe removed beginning in 1836. Tribal headquarters are in Okmulgee, Oklahoma: www.muscogeenation-nsn.gov  Smaller recognized tribes are in Alabama and Georgia.

When considering mixed-blood genealogy for Ulster roots, records often list a Muscogee by their tribal name. This was a matriarchal society so property was passed through the mother. If a family was trying to “pass for white” they would have associated with the father’s family.

Muscogee records can be found at the National Archives: www.archives.gov; Family History Library: www.familysearch.org; Oklahoma Historical Society: www.okhistory.org; and the Alabama Archives: www.archives.state.al.us

Three books written in the nineteenth century can provide some insights found nowhere else: George Stiggins’ Creek Indian  History: A Historical Narrative of the Genealogy, Traditions and Downfall of the Ispocoga or Creek Indian Tribe of Indians, edited by Virginia Pounds Brown (1989); Thomas Woodward’s, Woodward’s Reminiscences of the Creek, or Muscogee Indians, Contained in Letters to Friends in Georgia and Alabama) (1859, 1939); and Benjamin Hawkins’ A Sketch of the Creek Country, in the Years 1798 and 1799, and Letters of Benjamin Hawkins, 1796-1806 (1974).

By treaty (1832) the Muscogee ceded their lands to the U.S. which allotted parcels to individuals. They could sell, remove westward, or stay and be absorbed into the white community. For background information see; Mary Elizabeth Young’s Redskins Ruffleshirts and Rednecks: Indian Allotments in Alabama and Mississippi, 1830-1860 (1961). The names of Muscogee can be found in the Bureau of Land Management: www.glorecords.blm.govdatabase.

U.S. Government Rolls have been extracted on various websites. These include: Abbott and Parsons (1832); Lower Creek Census (1832); Old Settler Roll (1857); Dunn Roll of Citizens (1867); and Stidham Roll (1886).

If you have a legend of an Indian ancestor, then it’s worth your time to explore Muscogee records. You might be surprised to find your Scots-Irish ancestors mentioned.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: Ethnic Connections, Native Americans, Scots-Irish

What Does “Cherokee” Mean? (Part 2)

28 Aug By Dwight Leave a Comment

The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma has placed an extensive list online of organizations they consider fabricated and fraudulent; including state recognized tribes. While some tribes are fabricated; others mixed-bloods cannot produce a historical paper trail. A fascinating non-recognized tribe is the Chickamauga Cherokee Nation (White River Band and Sac River Band) with a strong Scots-Irish connection. Their pedigrees are valid, having had a genealogist trace them, and are on microfilm at the Family History Library: www.familysearch.org The Chickamauga Cherokee claim to be the tribe from the tri-state area around Chattanooga, Tennessee which moved westward decades prior to general removal and settled in what is today Arkansas and Missouri. They assimilated so thoroughly it wasn’t until they tried to gather the paper trail many white families learned of their Cherokee heritage. Pedigrees and histories were submitted, but they were denied state and federal recognition. However it left a massive compilation of genealogies.

The key to studying the Chickamauga Cherokee is in knowing core families of the Sac River Band in Arkansas are centered in Baxter, Benton, Fulton, Independence, Jackson, Johnson, Lawrence, Madison, Newton, Pope, Searcy, Sharp, Stone and Woodruff counties. The core White River Band of families in Missouri are centered in Barry, Dade, Greene, Hickory, Howell, McDonald, Lawrence, Ozark, Polk, St. Clair, Stone and Taney counties.

State recognized tribes include the following:

Alabama: Cher-O-Creek Intratribal Indians: www.aiac.alabama.gov/tribes_Cherocreek.aspx Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama: www.aiac.alabama.gov/tribes_NortheastCherokee.aspx Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama: www.echotacherokeetribe.homestead.com United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation: www.ucan-online.org

Georgia: The Cherokee of Georgia Tribal Council: www.cherokeeofgeorgia.us Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee: www.georgiatribeofeasterncherokee.com

South Carolina: Lower Eastern Cherokee Nation of South Carolina: www.paialowereasterncherokeenationssc.com

For unrecognized tribes, consult: www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unrecognized-tribes-in-the_United_States Again, this doesn’t necessarily mean fraudulent, and they may have genealogies. Approach all unrecognized tribes with background and education as to the validity of their research.

Lower Eastern Cherokee Nation of South Carolina

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: American Frontier, Cherokee Indians, Ethnic Connections, Native Americans

What Does “Cherokee” Mean? (Part 1)

27 Aug By Dwight Leave a Comment

The connection between the early Scots-Irish and the Cherokee Nation are well documented. Yes, we often to go records generated about Cherokee families, to learn about the Scots-Irish part of the family. However, once you have begun research, what exactly is meant by “Cherokee” can become somewhat muddled. This blog doesn’t seek to answer that question, but it does seek to let you know there’s a wide variety of records generated for both “recognized” and “unrecognized” Cherokee tribes. Maybe more appropriately, legally “acknowledged” and “unacknowledged” tribes 

There are three federally recognized tribes: the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (Tahlequah, OK): www.cherokee.org the Eastern Band Cherokee Indians (Cherokee, NC): www.nc-cherokee.com  and the United Keetoowah Band of Oklahoma (Tahlequah, OK): www.ukb-nsn.govThere are also smaller tribes of mixed-bloods who have obtained state but not federal recognition. In addition, numerous tribes have submitted genealogies in support of either state or federal claims for recognition but the applications of these tribes have been rejected or still pending. For this reason, it is important to understand which tribes are state or federally recognized based upon their genealogies and which are not.

Applying for state and federal recognition is a long and complicated legal process that takes years, and sometimes decades. When an organization is not legally seen as a tribe or has a pending petition, it generally means that the compiled history and submitted genealogies of the tribe do not meet either a state or a federal standard. It does not mean the tribe is not Cherokee, nor does it mean that their genealogies are invalid. Whether a tribe is approved or unapproved it still has some Scots-Irish connections. However, some organizations are indeed fraudulent and you need to be aware of this possibility as it affects genealogical research.

In Part 2 of this topic, I will discuss different Cherokee tribes and opinions regarding them.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: American Frontier, Cherokee Indians, Ethnic Connections, Native Americans

Using the 1870 U.S. Census in African American Research

18 Aug By Dwight Leave a Comment

In order to trace the Irish connection to an African American family; it’s first necessary to get past one major hurdle; the 1870 U.S. Census. This was the first federal census schedule to list the freed slaves by name, age, and birthplace. For this reason alone, it is among the most important genealogical resources which you can use in this type of research.

There are several factors to consider. The first is that this was only five years after the Civil War ended. The newly freed slaves were getting on their feet, and many were getting ready to move on. This means it was common for the freed slaves to be working on the very plantation they were freed from, or at least very close by. This was in a sharecropping arrangement where the freed slave would work the crops for part of the profit. Reality was usually much different. It actually differed little from slavery. Poor whites, and Tri-Racial Isolates, were also sharecroppers alongside the African Americans.

With all of its faults, abuses, and horrors, the sharecropping system at least kept families fed. It also bought families a few years of transition prior to moving far away from the old plantation. From a genealogical perspective, this means that the 1870 neighborhood where a black family was living was the old plantation itself. For our Irish Studies, this means the slave owner, who will be listed nearby in the same census can be identified. If he wasn’t the father, then you at least identified the last slave owner.

With the name of the last slave owner, this opens up surviving plantation records, and the county deeds documenting the buying and selling of slaves. Once the slave owner(s) are identified, then the way is clear to explore the Irish connection.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: African Americans, Census, Ethnic Connections, Strategies

Southeastern Passports (1770-1823)

4 Aug By Dwight Leave a Comment

Passports of Southeastern Pioneers 1770-1823

A fascinating yet odd source you might not think about is the passports to travel through Indian lands or foreign territories. It’s easy to forget that large portions of what is now the Southeastern United States were foreign lands into the late 1830s.

Passports were issued by Indian agents, which lead to resentment by other authorities. Soon state governors, Indian chiefs, Spanish office holders and even prominent civilians would issue their own version of a passport. Illegal passports were sometimes issued to traders for a fee. In theory, what the various passports had in common was they were to be granted upon an assurance of good conduct while in Indian lands or Spanish territories. In reality, every type of person imaginable applied for passports which would lead to frontier lawlessness. Regardless of how or by whom a passport was obtained, they are amazing and can be used to document the movement of people across the frontier. This authorized passage geographically was east of the Mississippi River in the period 1770-1823.

Prior to 1824, the Secretary of War was responsible for issuing passports, and the Government’s relations with the Indian tribes. In 1824, the Bureau of Indian Affairs was established within the War Department. The passport records for the pre-1824 period have been abstracted in Dorothy Williams Potter’s Passports of Southeastern Pioneers, 1770-1823: Indian, Spanish and Other Land Passports for Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Mississippi, Virginia, North and South Carolina(Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1982, 1990).

Southeastern map of the United States in 1800

This work is divided into section reflecting the different kinds of passports issued. These include Spanish Passports in the Mississippi Valley; British and Spanish Passports in West Florida; War and State Department Passports and State Passports. This is a major resource in your frontier research.

 

 

  • If you would like to receive our daily blog, e-mail us at: customerservice@thejourneyhomegenealogy.com

 

Professional Links

Dwight Radford, visit me at: www.thejourneyhomegenealogy.com

Leland Meitzler Publisher of genealogy products and books: www.FamilyRootsPublishing.com

Irish Genealogical Society International: www.irishgenealogical.org  I write articles for their journal The Septs

Kelowna & District Genealogical Society located in beautiful British Columbia: www.kdgs.ca I will be speaking at their conference in September

Mike O’Laughlin author of Irish family history books: www.irishroots.com

Sharon DeBartolo Carmack, MFA, CG professional book editing: www.nonfictionHelp.com  

Come enjoy the December research tour: www.SaltLakeChristmasTour.com I am one of the consultant’s at this wonderful event

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: American Frontier, Ethnic Connections, Scots-Irish, Spanish America

Who are the Melungeons?

23 Jul By Dwight Leave a Comment

Whenever I research in the mid-south region of Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina and Virginia, I always look for Melungeon ancestry, based upon surnames and race prior to 1870. Melungeons were “free color” not slaves.

The word Melungeon is believed to mean mixture. They intermarried usually with poor whites and among their community. Today, their descendants number in the milliions and are scattered across North America. Common family surnames:

Bolen/Bowling, Bunch, Cole, Collins, Delp, Denham, Fields, Freeman, Gann, Gibson/Gipson, Goins, Goodman, Graham, Hale, Ivey, Lawson, Lucas, Maloney, Miner/Minear, Mize, Moseley, Mullins/Melons, Nichols, Noel, Piniore, Sexton, Sweat/Sweet/Swett, Williams. It’s not difficult to pick out the Irish ones.

Reports from DNA studies on Melungeon families fill the Internet. Studies reveal a mixed-blood heritage now referred to as “Tri-Racial Isolates.” They came out of Colonial Virginia. The product of white indentured servants (thus the Irish surnames), blacks and Native Americans. Current books on Melungeon will have a chapter on the DNA findings.

From a genealogical perspective, two path breaking articles by Virginia Easley DeMarce and published in the National Genealogical Society Quarterly are: “Verry Slitly Mixt”: Tri-Racial Isolate Families of the Upper South – A Genealogical Study,” 80 (March 1992): 5-35 www.genpage.com/DeMarce.pdf  and  “Looking at Legends – Lumbee and Melungeon: Applied Genealogy and the Origins of Tri-Racial Isolates,” 81 (March 1993): 24-45 http://historical-melungeons.blogspot.com/2008/04/looking-at-legends-lumbee-and-melungeon.htmlThe colonial roots for many of these families have also been explored in Paul Heinegg’s monumental two volume work, Free African Americans of North Carolina, Virginia and South Carolina: From the Colonial Period to About 1820 (2005): www.freeafricanamericans.com/Virginia_NC.htm and his Free African Americans of Maryland and Delaware from the Colonial Period to 1810 (2000): www.freeafricanamericans.com/maryland.htm

The Melungeons are yet another chapter in our racially mixed colonial history involving the Irish. They like other Tri-Racial Isolates have survived historically because they didn’t fit in either the white and black communities.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry, Irish Periodicals Tagged With: African Americans, American Frontier, Colonial America, Ethnic Connections, Native Americans, Scots-Irish

India and the Colonial America Connection

15 Jul By Dwight Leave a Comment

Don’t be surprised if your Colonial American ancestors were actually from India. The colonial vocabulary used the term “East Indies” to describe the Indian subcontinent.

So how did these people get to the New World in the 1600s? The records themselves provide answers, and are extracted by Paul Heinegg as “Free African Americans of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland and Delaware”: www.freeafricanamericans.com/East_Indians.htm

Mr. Heinegg, notes that East Indians came in bondage as indentured servants and slaves

from England. He documents East Indians from the court records in Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina. He notes that although they tended to marry into the Free Black community, they also intermixed with the indentured white community, many of whom clearly had Irish surnames. The court records used often use the term “East India Indians.”

One very interesting case from the Spotsylvania County Order Books (1735-38) showed the distinction between the East Indians and African slaves (page 440):

“Zachary Lewis, Churchwarden of St. George Parish, presents Ann Jones, a servant belonging to John West, who declared that Pompey an East Indian (slave) belonging to William Woodford, Gent., was the father of sd child which was adjudged of by the Court that she was not under the law having a Mullato child, that only relates to Negroes and Mullatoes and being Silent as to Indians, carry sd. Ann Jones to the whipping post.”

In this case, Ann Jones, a presumed white indentured servant, had a child by Pompey, an East Indian slave. The laws were already in place restricting white indentured servants having children with African slaves. Yet, it had not caught up with the East Indian issue. In the end, Ann’s sentence was the whipping post!

What a fascinating piece of history with records to back it up.

Filed Under: Irish Ancestry Tagged With: African Americans, Asia, British India, Colonial America, Ethnic Connections, Immigration and Emigration, Indentured Servants, Slavery and Bondage

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Dwight A. Radford

Dwight A. Radford is a professional family history researcher. Along with his staff they specialize in Ireland, England, Canada, African American, Native American, and United States. Connecting families together through historical documents and then creating a cherished family heirloom published book for generations to enjoy. Full bio…

Follow Our Blog

Blog

  • How do You Determine the Associates of Your Ancestor?
  • When to Jump Over the Water in Your Research
  • Grand Lodge of Ireland Membership Records Online

Online Course

  • My Courses
  • Courses
  • My Account

Contact

  • About
  • Contact
  • Research Services

Journey Home Geneology © 2023 · Designed by GO Marketing